Re: [PATCH 0/5] Some vmevent fixes...

[Pekka Enberg]

On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 11:05 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
<kosaki.motohiro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Note that 1) and 2) are not problems per se, it's just implementation
>> details, easy stuff. Vmevent is basically an ABI/API, and I didn't
>> hear anybody who would object to vmevent ABI idea itself. More than
>> this, nobody stop us from implementing in-kernel vmevent API, and
>> make Android Lowmemory killer use it, if we want to.
>
> I never agree "it's mere ABI" discussion. Until the implementation is ugly,
> I never agree the ABI even if syscall interface is very clean.

I don't know what discussion you are talking about.

I also don't agree that something should be merged just because the
ABI is clean. The implementation must also make sense. I don't see how
we disagree here at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/