Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] kvm,x86: RCU based table free

[Nikunj A Dadhania]

On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 12:58:32 +0100, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> > On Tue, 5 Jun 2012 11:48:02 +0100, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > 
> > > I am also interested in introducing HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE on x86 for Xen.
> > > Maybe we can pull our efforts together :-)
> > > 
> > > Giving a look at this patch, it doesn't look like it is introducing
> > > CONFIG_HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE anywhere under arch/x86.
> > > How is the user supposed to set it?
> > >
> > I am doing that in the next patch only for KVM-ParavirtTLB flush, as
> > there is a bug in this implementation that patch [7/7] fixes.
> > 
> > Refer following thread for details:
> > http://mid.gmane.org/1337254086.4281.26.camel@twins
> > http://mid.gmane.org/1337273959.4281.62.camel@twins
> 
> Thanks, somehow I missed the 7/7 patch.
> 
> From the Xen POV, your patch is fine because we'll just select
> PARAVIRT_TLB_FLUSH on CONFIG_XEN (see appended patch for completeness).
> 
Selecting ARCH_HW_WALKS_PAGE_TABLE in place of PARAVIRT_TLB_FLUSH should
suffice.

> The main difference between the two approaches is that a kernel with
> PARAVIRT_TLB_FLUSH and/or CONFIG_XEN enabled is going to have
> HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE even when running on native.
> 
> Are you proposing this series for 3.5?
> If not (because it depends on ticketlocks and KVM Paravirt Spinlock
> patches), 
>
3.6 I suppose as the merge window is already closed and we are having
some discussions on PLE results.

> could you extract patch 6/7 and 7/7 and send them out
> separately?
>
> I am saying this because Xen needs the HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE fix even if
> pv ticketlock are not accepted. This is an outstanding bug for us
> unfortunately.
> 
PeterZ has a patch in his tlb-unify:

    mm, x86: Add HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE support
    
    Implements optional HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE support for x86.
    
    This is useful for things like Xen and KVM where paravirt tlb flush
    means the software page table walkers like GUP-fast cannot rely on
    IRQs disabling like regular x86 can.
    
    Cc: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
    Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
    Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>

http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/peterz/mmu.git;a=commit;h=8a7e6fa5be9d2645c3394892c870113e6e5d9309

PeterZ, is 7/7 alright to be picked?

Regards
Nikunj


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/