Re: [PATCH v2] remove no longer use of pdflush interface

[Wanpeng Li]

On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:37:34AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>On 06/06/2012 10:31 AM, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>
>> On 06/06/2012 01:28 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> 
>>> On Tue,  5 Jun 2012 17:26:11 +0800
>>> Wanpeng Li <liwp.linux@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> So perhaps the solution is to give up on the generic proc_obsolete()
>>> idea, and just add a handler specifically for nr_pdflush_threads, whcih
>>> uses printk_once().
>>>
>> 
>> 
>> If there are many users than a self made print once is worth it
>> we can use the ctl_table->data pointer for this, some thing like:
>> 
>> int nr_pdflush_was_printed;
>> 
>> @@ -1095,11 +1095,9 @@ static struct ctl_table vm_table[] = {
>>  		.extra1		= &zero,
>>  	},
>>  	{
>> -		.procname	= "nr_pdflush_threads",
>> -		.data		= &nr_pdflush_threads,
>> -		.maxlen		= sizeof nr_pdflush_threads,
>> -		.mode		= 0444 /* read-only*/,
>> -		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
>> +		.data		= &nr_pdflush_was_printed,
>> +		.procname       = "nr_pdflush_threads",
>> +		.mode           = 0444 /* read-only */,
>> +		.proc_handler   = proc_obsolete,
>>  	},
>> 
>> 
>> +/* notice associated proc deprecated */
>> +int proc_deprecated(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
>> +		    void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos, )
>> +{
>> +	if (*ctl_table->data) {
>
>
>+	if(!*ctl_table->data) {
    if(!*table->data) {
>
>> +		printk(KERN_WARNING "%s exported in /proc is deprecated\n",
>> +			table->procname);
>> +		*ctl_table->data = 0;
>
>
>+		*ctl_table->data = 1;
        *table->data = 1;

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

>
>stupid me, time for coffee
>
>Boaz
>
>> +	}
>> +	return -ENOSYS;
>> +}
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/