Re: [PATCH 0/6] x86/cpu hotplug: Wake up offline CPU via mwait ornmi
From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Wed Jun 06 2012 - 08:17:33 EST
On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 15:00 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:37:21PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 14:29 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > OK, I'll bite... Why not just use CPU hotplug to expel the timers?
> >
> > Currently? Can you say: 'kstopmachine'?
>
> So if CPU hotplug (or whatever you want to call it) stops using
> kstopmachine, you are OK with it?
It would be much better, still not ideal though.
> > But its also a question of interface and naming. Do you want to have to
> > iterate all cpus in your isolated set, do you want to bring them down
> > far enough to physically unplug. Ideally no to both.
>
> For many use cases, it is indeed not necessary to get to a point where
> the CPUs could be physically removed from the system. But CPU-failure
> use cases would need the CPU to be fully deactivated. And many of the
> hardware guys tell me that the CPU-failure case will be getting more
> common, though I sure hope that they are wrong.
Uhm, yeah, that doesn't sound right.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/