Re: [PATCH] Add Support for Novatek Touchscreen
From: Jiri Kosina
Date: Wed Jun 06 2012 - 10:03:15 EST
On Tue, 5 Jun 2012, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> >> Add support for a Novatek touchscreen panel as a generic HID multitouch
> >> panel.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Austin Hendrix <ahendrix@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> hid-core.c | 1 +
> >> hid-ids.h | 3 +++
> >> hid-multitouch.c | 5 +++++
> >> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> >> index 8e3a6b2..0d6dde1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-core.c
> >> @@ -1605,6 +1605,7 @@ static const struct hid_device_id
> >> hid_have_special_driver[] = {
> >
> > Austin,
> >
> > thanks for the patch. Your mail client is corrupting (line-wrapping)
> > patches. Please fix that for your future submissions.
> >
> > I have now fixed that up manually and applied.
> >
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_16) },
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_17) },
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG, USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_18) },
> >> + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NOVATEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_NOVATEK_PCT) },
>
> I don't think this should be included in 3.5-rc+ (the whole MT-related
> devices has been removed from this list).
Yeah, I have noticed this and fixed it in 3.5-rc+ branch.
>
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_PKB1700) },
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ORTEK, USB_DEVICE_ID_ORTEK_WKB2000) },
> >> { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PETALYNX,
> >> USB_DEVICE_ID_PETALYNX_MAXTER_REMOTE) },
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >> index 9373f53..734a2b9 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-ids.h
> >> @@ -564,6 +564,9 @@
> >> #define USB_VENDOR_ID_NINTENDO 0x057e
> >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_NINTENDO_WIIMOTE 0x0306
> >>
> >> +#define USB_VENDOR_ID_NOVATEK 0x0603
> >> +#define USB_DEVICE_ID_NOVATK_PCT 0x0600
> >> +
> >> #define USB_VENDOR_ID_NTRIG 0x1b96
> >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN 0x0001
> >> #define USB_DEVICE_ID_NTRIG_TOUCH_SCREEN_1 0x0003
> >> diff --git a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> >> index 6e3332a..fae08df 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/hid/hid-multitouch.c
> >> @@ -951,6 +951,11 @@ static const struct hid_device_id mt_devices[] = {
> >> MT_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_PANASONIC,
> >> USB_DEVICE_ID_PANABOARD_UBT880) },
> >>
> >> + /* Novatek Panel */
> >> + { .driver_data = MT_CLS_DEFAULT,
> >> + HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_NOVATEK,
> >> + USB_DEVICE_ID_NOVATEK_PCT) },
>
> Shouldn't we use MT_USB_DEVICE instead?
We should, I have missed this and will fix this up with your Reported-by:,
ok?
Thanks!
--
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/