Re: Suspend/resume regressions on Lenovo S10-3

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 06/06/2012 07:13 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 06, 2012, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> On 05/28/2012 07:23 AM, Dave Hansen wrote:
>>
>>> I have a Lenovo S10-3 Atom netbook.  It's always had some amount of
>>> trouble working with the intel_idle driver, so I usually compile that
>>> out an use the acpi one.  However, just after 3.1, suspend/resume broke.
>>>  'echo mem > /sys/power/state' would hang before suspending.  I bisected
>>> it down to the commits around:
>>>
>>> 	e978aa7d7d57d04eb5f88a7507c4fb98577def77 / v3.1-1-ge978aa7
>>>
>>> by Deepthi.  But, current mainline (v3.4-07644-g07acfc2) hangs with a
>>> different symptom: it suspends, but hangs on resume from suspend.  I
>>> think _that_ delta in the behavior was caused by:
>>>
>>> 	3439a8da16bcad6b0982ece938c9f8299bb53584
>>>
>>>         ACPI / cpuidle: Remove acpi_idle_suspend (to fix suspend
>>> 		regression)
>>>
>>> It's a bit of a pain to bisect these two different things in parallel.
>>> I was trying to tell git bisect 'good' on working suspend/resume, 'bad'
>>> on the hang during resume, and 'skip' on the hangs _during_ suspend.  83
>>> kernels in, I'm not sure that's working very well. :)
>>>
>>> Deepthi, do you have any idea why your patches broke me in the first
>>> place?  Perhaps we should fix that regression first before we go on and
>>> try to figure out what changed to let it suspend again, but break later.
>>
>>
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Sorry about my patches breaking your suspend-resume.
>>
>> I, basically tried out building and booting 3.1 kernel with 
>> my patch set to reproduce the failure. I could clearly
>> see suspend not happening. It turns out to be 
>> a bug with my first patch in global registration
>> series submitted earlier.
>>
>> e978aa7d7d57d04eb5f88a7507c4fb98577def77 / v3.1-1-ge978aa7
>>
>> The following patch, fixes the suspend issues
>> seen on my laptop due to earlier cpuidle cleanup 
>> (Lenevo T420 booting with acpi_idle enabled). 
>> Can you please give this a try
>> on top of my patch set (without Rafael's fix) 
>> and see if it fixes the problem for you. 
>> I am not reverting acpi_idle_suspend flag and 
>> hopefully it should resume fine too. 
>>
>> ---
>>
>> This patch fixes suspend-resume issue seen in the kernel 3.1
>> series using acpi_idle_driver because of cpuidle global 
>> registration cleanup.
>> Here, when acpi_idle_suspend flag was set ( during suspend)
>> the interrupts were not getting enabled in acpi_idle_enter_bm()
>> routine which was causing the system to hang.
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c |    3 ++-
>>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> index 24fe3af..6e35293 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
>> @@ -895,8 +895,9 @@ static int acpi_idle_enter_bm(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>>  	if (unlikely(!pr))
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  
>> -
>>  	if (acpi_idle_suspend) {
>> +		local_irq_disable();
>> +		local_irq_enable();
>>  		cpu_relax();
>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>  	}
> 
> May I say this is ugly?  Why can't we track the status of interrupts
> properly here?



I agree. Just the irq_enable call should do the trick.
Once the cpu enters idle via cpu_idle call, irqs are disabled. We
need to enable them if acpi_idle_suspend is set.
Else we'll see a hang during suspend.

The patch that was posted was just for workaround patch.
I shall do some more testing with just irq_enable call
and then shall post the fix which can be considered
for inclusion.

Cheers
Deepthi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/