RE: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQmigration

[Iyer, Sundar]

Hi Thomas,

Any comments on this version? Or do you suggest to add a new flag in the accessors and set it?

Thanks

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Iyer, Sundar
>Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 2:59 PM
>To: tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; lethal@xxxxxxxxxxxx; arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Iyer,
>Sundar; Monroy, German
>Subject: [PATCH v2] x86/irq: handle chained interrupts during IRQ migration
>
>Chained interrupt handlers dont have an irqaction and hence are not handled during
>migrating interrupts when some cores go offline.
>
>Handle this by introducing a irq_is_chained() check which is based on the the very least
>NOREQUEST, NOPROBE, and NOTHREAD flags being set for such interrupts.
>fixup_irq() can then handle such interrupts and not skip them over.
>
>Change-Id: I011de8bee98c1702a362deb06106845ca7bcad61
>Signed-off-by: Sundar Iyer <sundar.iyer@xxxxxxxxx>
>---
>v1: use accessors instead of new variables to identify chained irqs
>v2: use a mask of NOREQUEST, NOPROBE, and NOTHREAD accessor flags as per
>Paul M
>
> arch/x86/kernel/irq.c   |    6 ++++--
> include/linux/irqdesc.h |   11 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c index 6c0802e..acd7949 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
>@@ -249,8 +249,10 @@ void fixup_irqs(void)
>
> 		data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> 		affinity = data->affinity;
>-		if (!irq_has_action(irq) || irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
>-		    cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
>+		/* include IRQs who have no action, but are chained */
>+		if ((!irq_has_action(irq) && irq_is_chained(irq)) ||
>+			irqd_is_per_cpu(data) ||
>+			cpumask_subset(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
> 			raw_spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
> 			continue;
> 		}
>diff --git a/include/linux/irqdesc.h b/include/linux/irqdesc.h index 2d921b3..8d5eb42
>100644
>--- a/include/linux/irqdesc.h
>+++ b/include/linux/irqdesc.h
>@@ -120,6 +120,17 @@ static inline int irq_has_action(unsigned int irq)
> 	return desc->action != NULL;
> }
>
>+/*
>+ * Test to see if the IRQ is chained; it would not be requested and
>+hence
>+ * very miinimum _IRQ_NOREQUEST, _IRQ_NOPROBE, _IRQ_NOTHREAD  would be
>+set  */ static inline int irq_is_chained(unsigned int irq) {
>+	struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq);
>+	return !(desc->status_use_accessors &
>+			(IRQ_NOREQUEST | IRQ_NOPROBE | IRQ_NOTHREAD)); }
>+
> /* caller has locked the irq_desc and both params are valid */  static inline void
>__irq_set_handler_locked(unsigned int irq,
> 					    irq_flow_handler_t handler)
>--
>1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/