Re: [patch] BFS 420: a tiny step forward

[Hillf Danton]

On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Hillf Danton <dhillf@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Emmanuel
>
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benisty.e@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, the issue is still there.
>>
> Hang at same place?
>
And try to revert handling CPU_ONLINE, please.


--- a/kernel/sched/bfs.c	Sat Jun  2 17:30:28 2012
+++ b/kernel/sched/bfs.c	Thu Jun  7 20:58:36 2012
@@ -5352,7 +5352,7 @@ migration_call(struct notifier_block *nf
 		/* Update our root-domain */
 		grq_lock_irqsave(&flags);
 		if (rq->rd) {
-			BUG_ON(cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));
+			BUG_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, rq->rd->span));

 			set_rq_online(rq);
 		}
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/