Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)

From: Alan Cox
Date: Thu Jun 07 2012 - 12:34:39 EST


On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 18:32:42 +0200
Richard Weinberger <richard@xxxxxx> wrote:

> Am 07.06.2012 18:37, schrieb Alan Cox:
> > Yes I know exactly what is going on. However getting a more tolerant
> > behaviour is going to take a couple more kernels.
> >
>
> So, then please tell me what's the proper way to fix the UML console
> driver?
>
> - tty_port plus ->hangup() works only with a patched util-linux
> - tty_port without ->hangup() seems to work only if *getty does not
> call vhangup()

There isn't a nice one. It'll have to wait until 3.6/7 or so to get
fixed nicely and it won't backport either.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/