Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets, suspend/resume: Fixes,cleanups and optimizations

[Ingo Molnar]

* Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 05/24/2012 07:46 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> 
> > Currently the kernel doesn't handle cpusets properly during 
> > suspend/resume. After a resume, all non-root cpusets end up 
> > having only 1 cpu (the boot cpu), causing massive 
> > performance degradation of workloads. One major user of 
> > cpusets is libvirt, which means that after a 
> > suspend/hibernation cycle, all VMs suddenly end up running 
> > terribly slow!
> > 
> > Also, the kernel moves the tasks from one cpuset to another 
> > during CPU hotplug in the suspend/resume path, leading to a 
> > task-management nightmare after resume.
> > 
> > Patch 1 fixes this by keeping cpusets unmodified in the 
> > suspend/resume path. But to ensure we don't trip over, it 
> > keeps the sched domains updated during every CPU hotplug in 
> > the s/r path. This is a long standing issue and we need to 
> > fix up stable kernels too.
> > 
> > The rest of the patches in the series are mostly 
> > cleanups/optimizations.
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
> Would you be taking these patches through -tip for 3.6?

They are now in tip:sched/core.

Note that I removed the Cc:stable tag - it's not a regression 
fix and such it is not eligible for immediate -stable backports.

( Once they are upstream and have been problem-free upstream for
  several weeks then *maybe* we could forward the first commit
  to -stable, as a super special exception. )

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/