Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] cleanup imx5 idle, add imx5/6 cpuidle

[Rob Lee]

On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Rob Lee <rob.lee@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello Sascha,
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Hi Robert,
>>
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:50:23PM -0500, Robert Lee wrote:
>>> Cleanup up imx5 idle code and enable imx5 low powe idle for imx53.
>>>
>>> Add common imx cpuidle initialization functionality and add a i.MX5 and i.MX6Q
>>> platform cpuidle implementation.
>>
>> I rebased this to 3.5-rc1 here:
>>
>> git.pengutronix.de/git/imx/linux-2.6.git imx/cpuidle
>>
>> Could you check if the result is ok with you?
>>
>
> Certainly.  I will let you know in a day or two.
>

I did some basic testing and everything looks ok as far as idle and
cpuidle goes.  For imx51 and 53 I tested both device tree and
non-device tree boot.  On my imx51-babbage board, a generic
imx_v6_v7_defconfig does not boot without enabling device tree and
shows no output after the u-boot messages.  But this also occurs on
the kernel.org v3.5-rc3.  Removing support for all boards except
imx51-babbage makes it boot up ok.  The idle changes don't seem to
affect this behavior.

> Rob
>
>> Sascha
>>
>>
>> --
>> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
>> Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
>> Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
>> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/