Re: BUG: tracer_alloc_buffers returned with preemption imbalance

[David Rientjes]

On Sun, 24 Jun 2012, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> But in my case, the trailing preempt_enable() should not have been
> optimized away, right?  Wouldn't it be more like the following?
> 
> int a = 0;
> int main(void)
> {
> 	a++;
> 	return ++a;
> 	a++;
> }
> 
> Hmmm...  But this -still- doesn't emit any warnings.
> 

gcc removed -Wunreachable-code a couple years ago.  It doesn't complain 
when you pass it for backwards compatibility with old Makefiles.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/