Re: [PATCH SLUB 1/2] duplicate the cache name in saved_alias list

From: Glauber Costa
Date: Mon Jun 25 2012 - 07:13:37 EST


On 06/25/2012 01:53 PM, Li Zhong wrote:
SLUB duplicates the cache name in kmem_cache_create(). However if the
cache could be merged to others during early booting, the name pointer
is saved in saved_alias list, and the string needs to be kept valid
before slab_sysfs_init() is called.

This patch tries to duplicate the cache name in saved_alias list, so
that the cache name could be safely kfreed after calling
kmem_cache_create(), if that name is kmalloced.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhong <zhong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/slub.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index 8c691fa..3dc8ed5 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -5373,6 +5373,11 @@ static int sysfs_slab_alias(struct kmem_cache *s,
const char *name)

al->s = s;
al->name = name;
+ al->name = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!al->name) {
+ kfree(al);
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
al->next = alias_list;
alias_list = al;
return 0;
@@ -5409,6 +5414,7 @@ static int __init slab_sysfs_init(void)
if (err)
printk(KERN_ERR "SLUB: Unable to add boot slab alias"
" %s to sysfs\n", s->name);
+ kfree(al->name);
kfree(al);
}



What's unsafe about the current state of affairs ?
Whenever we alias, we'll increase the reference counter.
kmem_cache_destroy will only actually destroy the structure whenever that refcnt reaches zero.

This means that kfree shouldn't happen until then. So what is exactly that you are seeing?

Now, if you ask me, keeping the name around in user-visible files like /proc/slabinfo for caches that are removed already can be a bit confusing (that is because we don't add aliases to the slab_cache list)

If you want to touch this, one thing you can do is to keep a list of names bundled in an alias. If an alias is removed, you free that name. If that name is the representative name of the bundle, you move to the next one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/