Re: [PATCH RESEND] input: gpio_keys_polled: convert to dt
From: Alexandre Pereira da Silva
Date: Mon Jun 25 2012 - 11:04:34 EST
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:43 AM, Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 06/20/2012 06:34 AM, Alexandre Pereira da Silva wrote:
>> Add device tree support to gpio_keys_polled.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Pereira da Silva <aletes.xgr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>> 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> Needs binding documentation.
>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
>> index 20c8ab1..a64b361 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/keyboard/gpio_keys_polled.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio.h>
>> #include <linux/gpio_keys.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_platform.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_gpio.h>
>>
>> #define DRV_NAME "gpio-keys-polled"
>>
>> @@ -38,7 +40,7 @@ struct gpio_keys_button_data {
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev {
>> struct input_polled_dev *poll_dev;
>> struct device *dev;
>> - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data pdata;
>> struct gpio_keys_button_data data[0];
>> };
>>
>> @@ -67,11 +69,11 @@ static void gpio_keys_polled_check_state(struct input_dev *input,
>> static void gpio_keys_polled_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev *bdev = dev->private;
>> - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = bdev->pdata;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = &bdev->pdata;
>> struct input_dev *input = dev->input;
>> int i;
>>
>> - for (i = 0; i < bdev->pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
>> + for (i = 0; i < pdata->nbuttons; i++) {
>> struct gpio_keys_button_data *bdata = &bdev->data[i];
>>
>> if (bdata->count < bdata->threshold)
>> @@ -85,7 +87,7 @@ static void gpio_keys_polled_poll(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
>> static void gpio_keys_polled_open(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev *bdev = dev->private;
>> - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = bdev->pdata;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = &bdev->pdata;
>>
>> if (pdata->enable)
>> pdata->enable(bdev->dev);
>> @@ -94,23 +96,125 @@ static void gpio_keys_polled_open(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
>> static void gpio_keys_polled_close(struct input_polled_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev *bdev = dev->private;
>> - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = bdev->pdata;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = &bdev->pdata;
>>
>> if (pdata->disable)
>> pdata->disable(bdev->dev);
>> }
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>> +static int gpio_keys_polled_get_devtree_pdata(struct device *dev,
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *node, *pp;
>> + int i;
>> + struct gpio_keys_button *buttons;
>> + u32 reg;
>> +
>> + node = dev->of_node;
>> + if (node == NULL)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + memset(pdata, 0, sizeof *pdata);
>
> parentheses around *pdata.
>
>> +
>> + pdata->rep = !!of_get_property(node, "autorepeat", NULL);
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(node, "poll-interval", ®) == 0)
>> + pdata->poll_interval = reg;
>
> You can just do this instead of the if:
>
> of_property_read_u32(node, "poll-interval", &pdata->poll_interval);
>
>
>> +
>> + /* First count the subnodes */
>> + pdata->nbuttons = 0;
>
> You already to this to 0.
>
>> + pp = NULL;
>> + while ((pp = of_get_next_child(node, pp)))
>> + pdata->nbuttons++;
>
> of_get_child_count()
>
>> +
>> + if (pdata->nbuttons == 0)
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +
>> + buttons = kzalloc(pdata->nbuttons * (sizeof *buttons), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!buttons)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + pp = NULL;
>> + i = 0;
>> + while ((pp = of_get_next_child(node, pp))) {
>
> for_each_child_of_node
>
>> + enum of_gpio_flags flags;
>> +
>> + if (!of_find_property(pp, "gpios", NULL)) {
>> + pdata->nbuttons--;
>> + dev_warn(dev, "Found button without gpios\n");
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> + buttons[i].gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(pp, 0, &flags);
>> + buttons[i].active_low = flags & OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW;
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "linux,code", ®)) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "Button without keycode: 0x%x\n", buttons[i].gpio);
>> + goto out_fail;
>> + }
>> + buttons[i].code = reg;
>> +
>> + buttons[i].desc = of_get_property(pp, "label", NULL);
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "linux,input-type", ®) == 0)
>> + buttons[i].type = reg;
>> + else
>> + buttons[i].type = EV_KEY;
>
> if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "linux,input-type", &buttons[i].type))
> buttons[i].type = EV_KEY;
>
>> +
>> + buttons[i].wakeup = !!of_get_property(pp, "gpio-key,wakeup", NULL);
>> +
>> + if (of_property_read_u32(pp, "debounce-interval", ®) == 0)
>> + buttons[i].debounce_interval = reg;
>> + else
>> + buttons[i].debounce_interval = 5;
>
> ditto
>
>> +
>> + i++;
>> + }
>> +
>> + pdata->buttons = buttons;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +out_fail:
>> + kfree(buttons);
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct of_device_id gpio_keys_polled_of_match[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "gpio-keys-polled", },
>> + { },
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, gpio_keys_polled_of_match);
>> +#else
>> +
>> +static int gpio_keys_polled_get_devtree_pdata(struct device *dev,
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *altp)
>> +{
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> +}
>> +
>> +#define gpio_keys_polled_of_match NULL
>> +
>> +#endif
>>
>> static int __devinit gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data alt_pdata;
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev *bdev;
>> struct input_polled_dev *poll_dev;
>> struct input_dev *input;
>> int error;
>> int i;
>>
>> - if (!pdata || !pdata->poll_interval)
>> + if (!pdata) {
>> + error = gpio_keys_polled_get_devtree_pdata(dev, &alt_pdata);
>> + if (error)
>> + return error;
>> + pdata = &alt_pdata;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (!pdata->poll_interval)
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> bdev = kzalloc(sizeof(struct gpio_keys_polled_dev) +
>> @@ -184,7 +288,7 @@ static int __devinit gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> bdev->poll_dev = poll_dev;
>> bdev->dev = dev;
>> - bdev->pdata = pdata;
>> + bdev->pdata = *pdata;
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, bdev);
>>
>> error = input_register_polled_device(poll_dev);
>> @@ -217,7 +321,7 @@ err_free_bdev:
>> static int __devexit gpio_keys_polled_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> struct gpio_keys_polled_dev *bdev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = bdev->pdata;
>> + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = &bdev->pdata;
>> int i;
>>
>> input_unregister_polled_device(bdev->poll_dev);
>> @@ -239,6 +343,7 @@ static struct platform_driver gpio_keys_polled_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = DRV_NAME,
>> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> + .of_match_table = gpio_keys_polled_of_match,
>> },
>> };
>> module_platform_driver(gpio_keys_polled_driver);
Thanks for reviewing. I will submit patches for both gpio-keys and
gpio-keys-polled to address those issues.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/