Re: [PATCH 09/11] memcg: propagate kmem limiting information tochildren

[David Rientjes]

On Mon, 25 Jun 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:

> > --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> > +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> > @@ -287,7 +287,11 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> >  	 * Should the accounting and control be hierarchical, per subtree?
> >  	 */
> >  	bool use_hierarchy;
> > -	bool kmem_accounted;
> > +	/*
> > +	 * bit0: accounted by this cgroup
> > +	 * bit1: accounted by a parent.
> > +	 */
> > +	volatile unsigned long kmem_accounted;
> 
> I suggest
> 
> 	unsigned long kmem_accounted;	/* See KMEM_ACCOUNTED_*, below */
> 
> >  	bool		oom_lock;
> >  	atomic_t	under_oom;
> > @@ -340,6 +344,9 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
> >  #endif
> >  };
> >  
> > +#define KMEM_ACCOUNTED_THIS	0
> > +#define KMEM_ACCOUNTED_PARENT	1
> 
> And then document the fields here.
> 

In hex, please?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/