Re: [PATCH 1/1] locks: prevent side-effects oflocks_release_private before file_lock is initialized

[J. Bruce Fields]

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:10:35PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> Just to let you know that I just tested the patch below on top of
> 3.5.0-rc4 and it works fine...
> 
> Do you like the idea of this second patch or do you prefer the
> __locks_free_lock() one?

Like I said:

> Let's just go with your first patch and free the thing by hand (but
> add a comment explaining why).
> 
> Then come back and figure out how to make the interface clearer once
> we've got the bug fixed.

--b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/