Re: excessive CPU utilization by isolate_freepages?

[David Rientjes]

On Wed, 27 Jun 2012, Rik van Riel wrote:

> > I doubt compaction try to migrate continuously although we have no free
> > memory.
> > Could you apply this patch and retest?
> > 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/21/30
> 

Not sure if Jim is using memcg; if not, then this won't be helpful.

> Another possibility is that compaction is succeeding every time,
> but since we always start scanning all the way at the beginning
> and end of each zone, we waste a lot of CPU time rescanning the
> same pages (that we just filled up with moved pages) to see if
> any are free.
> 
> In short, due to the way compaction behaves right now,
> compaction + isolate_freepages are essentially quadratic.
> 
> What we need to do is remember where we left off after a
> successful compaction, so we can continue the search there
> at the next invocation.
> 

So when the free and migration scanners meet and compact_finished() == 
COMPACT_CONTINUE, loop around to the start of the zone and continue until 
you reach the pfn that it was started at?  Seems appropriate.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/