Re: [PATCH] kvm: handle last_boosted_vcpu = 0 case

[Andrew Jones]

----- Original Message -----
> In summary, current PV has huge benefit on non-PLE machine.
> 
> On PLE machine, the results become very sensitive to load, type of
> workload and SPIN_THRESHOLD. Also PLE interference has significant
> effect on them. But still it has slight edge over non PV.
> 

Hi Raghu,

sorry for my slow response. I'm on vacation right now (until the
9th of July) and I have limited access to mail. Also, thanks for
continuing the benchmarking. Question, when you compare PLE vs.
non-PLE, are you using different machines (one with and one
without), or are you disabling its use by loading the kvm module
with the ple_gap=0 modparam as I did?

Drew
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/