Re: [RFC] [TCP 1/3] tcp: Add MSG_NEW_PACKET flag to indicatepreferable packet boundaries

[Andreas Gruenbacher]

On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 17:11 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 16:54 +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> > The MSG_NEW_PACKET flag indicates to sendmsg / sendpage that the message or
> > page should be put into a new packet even when there is still room left in the
> > previous packet.
> > 
> > In the tcp protocol, messages which are not sent immediately are queued.  When
> > more data is sent, it will be added to the last segment in that queue until
> > that segment is "full" whenever possible; only then is a new segment added.
> > Right now, there is no way to indicate when tcp should start a new segment.
> > The new flag allows to control that.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> 
> I don't understand how maintaining any message boundaries at sender can
> prevent any middlebox or the receiver to coalesce frames to any
> boundaries it prefers ?

The primary use case is fast Gigabit (10 or more) Ethernet connections
with jumbo frames and switches that support them.  There, frames will go
through unchanged and you can zero-copy receive all the time.

Not sure how well the approach scales to other kinds of connections; it
may work often enough to be worth it.  When things get distorted between
the sender and the receiver and tcp_recvbio() fails, the data can still
be copied out of the socket as before.

Andreas

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/