Re: [PATCH 0/4] Was: deferring __fput()

From: Al Viro
Date: Sat Jun 30 2012 - 01:02:41 EST


On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 07:56:37PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> Looking at /var/log/messages, seems like the ata4 and ata5 "SATA link
> down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)" messages are normal.
>
> ata5: SATA link down (SStatus 0 SControl 300)
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 1016k freed
> Write protecting the kernel read-only data: 12288k
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 1964k freed
> Freeing unused kernel memory: 1468k freed
> Failed to execute /init
> Kernel panic - not syncing. No init Found. Try passing init= option ...
> Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 not tainted 3.5.0-rc1+
> Call Trace:
> panic
> init_post
> kernel_init
> ?do_early_param
> kernel_thread_helper
> start_kernel

Just to make sure - you are not getting IMA violations among all that? AFAICS,
the damn thing should behave no worse in that respect than your own patch
a while ago, and you haven't mentioned them in this thread, but...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/