Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: support deferred probe for DT GPIOs

[Mark Brown]

On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:30:51AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> I did consider making of_get_fixed_voltage_config() return a result
> code, but then it needs some other way of returning the pointer, so
> that seemed just as convoluted. Oh, I suppose it could use ERR_PTR()
> to do that; that'd be nice and simple. Would that do?

Meh, or just have the caller pass in the platform data rather than
allocate it in the function.

> Re: gpiolib doing it: How is that possible? of_get_named_gpio()
> certainly can return -EPROBE_DEFER, but the caller would still need to
> check it. The ideal case might be to just do:

> ret = gpio_request(of_get_named_gpio(...));
> if (ret)
>     return ret;

> and have gpio_request pass -EPROBE_DEFER from input to output.

Even better just have gpio_request() just return -EPROBE_DEFER instead
of -ENODEV.  There is no sane case where you'd request a GPIO you didn't
have a reasonable idea was going to be registered at some point (or
could be with appropriate system configuration) so we should just assume
that might happen.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature