On Thursday 05 July 2012, Lee Jones wrote:
On 05/07/12 15:13, Mark Brown wrote:On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:06:20PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:On 05/07/12 14:57, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
The non-DT path for this is a huge mess, I'd rather focus on making
it obsolete than trying to fix it. Other than that, I agree that
we should be registering the ab8500 from the prcmu from both the
DT and the non-DT case.
Ah, is that what you were saying Mark?
If so, I apologise. I thought you meant register both from platform
code. I'm happy to register the AB8500 from the DB8500 for both DT
and !DT.
Yes, that's what I was trying to say - sorry that I wasn't clear!
Well it seems silly of me just to copy Arnd's work. Do you want to
author and submit the patch to do this Arnd?
No, just assume ownership of it. I haven't tried building the
patch, so I assume you will have to change it some more. Just
list me as Suggested-by:.