Re: [PATCH 2/2] fat (exportfs): reconnect file handles to evicted inodes/dentries

[OGAWA Hirofumi]

"Steven J. Magnani" <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> How do you prevent to modify or free the those inode/blocks from other
>> path?  Yeah, it is racy. And if races is not solved, that's simply wrong
>> and not solution.
>> 
>> Although I'm not thinking deeply about NFS support on FAT. Just a idea,
>> the one of possible solutions would be register it to hash, and find it
>> on all path. So, all path will use same inode and lock.
>> 
>> We need the key, possible key is - if it is only directory, FAT may be
>> able to use i_start as additional search key.
>
> Interesting idea. I think this, and reformulating the FAT NFS file
> handle to include the parent's i_ino, will greatly simplify (and speed
> up) the code.

Does it work even if the inode was rename()'ed?
-- 
OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/