Re: [Regression][Revert request] Excessive delay or hang duringresume from system suspend due to a hrtimer commit

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> On Monday, July 16, 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Sun, 15 Jul 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > To everyone involved: the fact that this change, which was likely to introduce
> > > regressions from the look of it alone, has been pushed to Linus (an to -stable
> > > at the same time!) so late in the cycle, is seriuosly disappointing.
> > 
> > Well, we spent an massive amount of time in testing, reviewing and
> > discussion and it definitely did not break suspend/resume here.
> 
> I'm not saying that you didn't consider it thoroughly, but unfortunately you
> did overlook this particular issue, didn't you?
> 
> > This was not pushed without a lot of thoughts and in fact what you are
> > seing is another long standing bug in the timekeeping resume code,
> > which was just papered over by the incorrect handling of the clock was
> > set cases in the other parts of the system.
> > 
> > Does the following patch fix the problem for you ?
> 
> Yes, it does, thanks!
> 
> > @John: Should that clear ntp as well or is it enough to set ntp_error
> >        to 0 ?
> > 
> > /me really goes on vacation now.
> 
> So who's going to take care of the patch? :-)

I'm still packing gear. So i'll push it into timers/urgent.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/