Re: 3.5-rc6 dentry related GPF
From: Al Viro
Date: Mon Jul 16 2012 - 18:28:33 EST
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 05:53:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:32:18PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:10:12PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > rdi = 54415541e5894855
> > >
> > > which looks like some odd corrupted ASCII to me ("UH\211\345AUAT") but
> > > that makes no sense either.
> >
> > It makes a lot of sense as amd64 code, though:
> >
> > 55 push %rbp
> > 48 89 e5 mov %rsp,%rbp
> > 41 55 push %r13
> > 41 54 push %r12
> >
> > IOW, it's the first 8 bytes from a fairly sane beginning of some function.
> > So &(inode->i_fop->owner) (and thus inode->i_fop - owner is the first field)
> > is some spot in .text. Would be interesting to find out what function
> > was that from (i.e. what's the value of inode->i_fop); with any luck it
> > might've still been in some register. Could you post objdump of
> > do_dentry_open() from your kernel?
>
> I've done a few rebuilds since posting that, but hopefully things haven't
> moved around too much in that area recently..
>
> http://fpaste.org/Pw5d/ is the whole open.o disassembly.
Lousy...
mov 0x200(%r14),%rax // r14 == inode, rax = inode->i_fop
test %rax,%rax // if (rax)
je 1f // {
mov (%rax),%rdi // rdi = rax->owner
callq try_module_get // rax = try_module_get(rdi);
1f:
... and the value of inode->i_fop, which somehow has turned out to be
the address of some function prologue, was only in rax. Clobbered
by the point where try_module_get() has oopsed ;-/
Alas. Looks like all we are getting out of that one is that some
function address has ended up in inode->i_fop...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/