Re: [PATCH] ftrace: using pr_fmt for better printk output

[Joe Perches]

On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 13:23 +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 12:25 PM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 20:42 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> >
> >> > diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
> >> []
> >> > @@ -13,6 +13,8 @@
> >> >   *  Copyright (C) 2004 William Lee Irwin III
> >> >   */
> >> >
> >> > +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "ftrace: " fmt
> >>
> >> #define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> >
> > Wouldn't a nicer patch be to move this into a header file and then
> > remove all the defines throughout the kernel tree?
> 
> Maybe it's hard to achieve that.
> subsystem name is unique with each other, it should be visible in source file,
> if include into header file, then each .c file might need a own header
> file for include pr_fmt
> definition, then that header file cannot be reusable(avoid subsystem
> name conflicts).
> 
> >
> > Also, what is KBUILD_MODNAME defined as for non-modules? As ftrace is
> > not a module.
> Yes, that's why I cannot use KBUILD_MODNAME in patch.

Incorrect, try it.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/