Re: [PATCH 3/4] x86: add desc_equal() to compare GDT descriptors

[H. Peter Anvin]

Sorry we're all travelling at the moment

David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 09/07/12 11:39, David Vrabel wrote:
>> From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
>ping?  Can we get an x86 an x86 maintainer for this patch, please?
>
>David
>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h |    6 ++++++
>>  1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
>b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
>> index 8bf1c06..d26f059 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/desc.h
>> @@ -85,6 +85,12 @@ static inline int desc_empty(const void *ptr)
>>  	return !(desc[0] | desc[1]);
>>  }
>>  
>> +static inline bool desc_equal(const struct desc_struct *d1,
>> +			      const struct desc_struct *d2)
>> +{
>> +	return d1->a == d2->a && d1->b == d2->b;
>> +}
>> +
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT
>>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
>>  #else

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/