Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] kvm: Extend irqfd to support level interrupts

[Alex Williamson]

On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 01:00 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 03:57:41PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 00:26 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:33:47PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > > @@ -96,6 +183,9 @@ irqfd_shutdown(struct work_struct *work)
> > > >  	 * It is now safe to release the object's resources
> > > >  	 */
> > > >  	eventfd_ctx_put(irqfd->eventfd);
> > > > +
> > > > +	_irq_source_put(irqfd->source);
> > > > +
> > > >  	kfree(irqfd);
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > 
> > > Hang on, this is a bug I think. This is done asynchronously.  So this
> > > means that I can assign MAX number of irqfds, then close one, and now
> >                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ What is this?
> > Do you mean max irq source ids?
> 
> Yes, this is what I meant. Sorry about being unclear.
> 
> > > assign will fail because deassign did not get freed.
> > > 
> > > Maybe we can solve this by flushing wq before assign?
> > > Looks a bit fragile but may be enough - need to document well.

Why is this fragile?  We could even make it part of a retry so we don't
call it unless we need to.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/