Re: [REGRESSION] [PATCH] block: uninitialized ioc->nr_taskstriggers WARN_ON

[Tejun Heo]

Hello, Olof.

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:36:43PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> It seems like the init of ioc->nr_tasks was removed in that patch,
> so it starts out at 0 instead of 1.
> 
> Tejun, is the right thing here to add back the init, or should something else
> be done?
>
> The below patch removes the warning, but I haven't done any more extensive
> testing on it.
> 
> 
> Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>

Right, the patch shouldn't have replaced the init.

 Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>

Fortunately, the effect of the bug is limited.  ioc->nr_tasks only
used to veto block cgroup migration if a task has ioc which is shared
by multiple tasks.  Currently, the only known program using CLONE_IO
is dump and even if somebody migrates some threads of a single dump
instance to a different block cgroup, the result won't be catastrophic
although block cgroup policies would become ambiguous.  IMHO, it
should be okay to route this through -stable after 3.5.  Jens?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/