RE: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces

[Moore, Robert]

>> I wouldn't have a problem renaming a few of those to
>> something like:
>>
>> #define ACPI_INFO(plist)	acpi_old_info plist
>> #define ACPI_WARNING(plist)	acpi_old_warning plist
>> #define ACPI_ERROR(plist)	acpi_old_error plist
>>
>> The acpi folk might though.
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>ACPI CA is being developed by Intel as OS-neutral code, and is used by
>multiple OSes including Linux.  So, I am not sure how easy to make such
>changes.  I am copying to Lin Ming.


Please don't even consider doing something like this. As we continue to develop and maintain the ACPICA code, these kinds of OS-specific divergences from the base ACPICA code cause us all kinds of grief, including the accidental creation of new bugs as it becomes more and more difficult to integrate the base ACPICA code back into Linux.

In fact, we have a major project this year (and probably far into next year) to continue to minimize (i.e., fix) this type of Linux/ACPICA divergence -- of which many have crept in over the years that ACPICA has been present in the Linux kernel.

Bob
















>-----Original Message-----
>From: linux-acpi-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:linux-acpi-
>owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Toshi Kani
>Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2012 3:08 PM
>To: Joe Perches; Lin, Ming M
>Cc: lenb@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-
>kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx;
>isimatu.yasuaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; liuj97@xxxxxxxxx;
>srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; prarit@xxxxxxxxxx; imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx;
>vijaymohan.pandarathil@xxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] ACPI: Add acpi_pr_<level>() interfaces
>
>On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:54 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 15:41 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:21 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 14:40 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote:
>> > > > This patch introduces acpi_pr_<level>(), where <level> is a message
>> > > > level such as err/warn/info, to support improved logging messages
>> > > > for ACPI, esp. in hotplug operations.  acpi_pr_<level>() appends
>> > > > "ACPI" prefix and ACPI object path to the messages.  This improves
>> > > > diagnostics in hotplug operations since it identifies an object
>that
>> > > > caused an issue in a log file.
>> []
>> > > I'd be tempted to instead make the calls more like
>> > > other <subsystem>_<level> uses and rename these to
>> > > acpi_<level> and change the existing acpi_info to
>> > > another name.
>> []
>> > I agree with you.  Unfortunately, the ACPI CA (ACPI FW interpreter)
>> > already uses them for its internal-use as follows, so I needed to come
>> > up with some other name...  Hence, acpi_pr_<level>.
>> >
>> > /*
>> >  * Error reporting. Callers module and line number are inserted by
>AE_INFO,
>> >  * the plist contains a set of parens to allow variable-length lists.
>> >  * These macros are used for both the debug and non-debug versions of
>the code.
>> >  */
>> > #define ACPI_INFO(plist)                acpi_info plist
>> > #define ACPI_WARNING(plist)             acpi_warning plist
>> > #define ACPI_EXCEPTION(plist)           acpi_exception plist
>> > #define ACPI_ERROR(plist)               acpi_error plist
>> > #define ACPI_DEBUG_OBJECT(obj,l,i)
>acpi_ex_do_debug_object(obj,l,i)
>>
>> I wouldn't have a problem renaming a few of those to
>> something like:
>>
>> #define ACPI_INFO(plist)	acpi_old_info plist
>> #define ACPI_WARNING(plist)	acpi_old_warning plist
>> #define ACPI_ERROR(plist)	acpi_old_error plist
>>
>> The acpi folk might though.
>
>Hi Joe,
>
>ACPI CA is being developed by Intel as OS-neutral code, and is used by
>multiple OSes including Linux.  So, I am not sure how easy to make such
>changes.  I am copying to Lin Ming.
>
>
>> > > Other than that, seems fine to me.
>> > Great!  Can I consider it as Ack? :)
>>
>> Fix the kfree first.
>
>Please see my other email.  Do you think the check should be added
>despite of the warning message?
>
>
>> I rarely ack stuff as other people generally have to
>> pick up the changes and I think acks are overrated.
>
>That's fair enough.
>
>Thanks!
>-Toshi
>
>
>> cheers, Joe
>>
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/