Re: [PATCH] hugetlb/cgroup: Simplify pre_destroy callback
From: Aneesh Kumar K.V
Date: Thu Jul 19 2012 - 05:42:04 EST
Li Zefan <lizefan@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> on 2012/7/19 10:55, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>
>> Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 11:04:09 +0530
>>> "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>
>>>> Since we cannot fail in hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent, we don't really
>>>> need to check whether cgroup have any change left after that. Also skip
>>>> those hstates for which we don't have any charge in this cgroup.
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> + for_each_hstate(h) {
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * if we don't have any charge, skip this hstate
>>>> + */
>>>> + idx = hstate_index(h);
>>>> + if (res_counter_read_u64(&h_cg->hugepage[idx], RES_USAGE) == 0)
>>>> + continue;
>>>> + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>>> + list_for_each_entry(page, &h->hugepage_activelist, lru)
>>>> + hugetlb_cgroup_move_parent(idx, cgroup, page);
>>>> + spin_unlock(&hugetlb_lock);
>>>> + VM_BUG_ON(res_counter_read_u64(&h_cg->hugepage[idx], RES_USAGE));
>>>> + }
>>>> out:
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> This looks fishy.
>>>
>>> We test RES_USAGE before taking hugetlb_lock. What prevents some other
>>> thread from increasing RES_USAGE after that test?
>>>
>>> After walking the list we test RES_USAGE after dropping hugetlb_lock.
>>> What prevents another thread from incrementing RES_USAGE before that
>>> test, triggering the BUG?
>>
>> IIUC core cgroup will prevent a new task getting added to the cgroup
>> when we are in pre_destroy. Since we already check that the cgroup doesn't
>> have any task, the RES_USAGE cannot increase in pre_destroy.
>>
>
>
> You're wrong here. We release cgroup_lock before calling pre_destroy and retrieve
> the lock after that, so a task can be attached to the cgroup in this interval.
>
But that means rmdir can be racy right ? What happens if the task got
added, allocated few pages and then moved out ? We still would have task
count 0 but few pages, which we missed to to move to parent cgroup.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/