Re: [PATCH 5/9] KVM: MMU: fask check write-protect for direct mmu

[Marcelo Tosatti]

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 09:53:29PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> If it have no indirect shadow pages we need not protect any gfn,
> this is always true for direct mmu without nested
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Xiao,

What is the motivation? Numbers please.

In fact, what case was the original indirect_shadow_pages conditional in
kvm_mmu_pte_write optimizing again?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/