Re: [trivial PATCH resend 2/2] ixgbe: use PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL

From: Jeff Kirsher
Date: Fri Jul 20 2012 - 03:14:02 EST


On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 00:02 -0700, Jon Mason wrote:
> Use PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL from pci_ids.h instead of creating its own
> vendor ID #define.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jon Mason <jdmason@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_sriov.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_type.h | 3 ---
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

Same goes for this patch as well (not being trivial).

I already have several patches submitted for Dave against ixgbe
currently and I am not sure if there would be any issues with this patch
applying on top of the currently submitted patches. I will verify this
applies cleanly with no issue to my current net-next tree before I send
my ACK.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part