Re: [PATCHSET] workqueue: reimplement CPU hotplug to keep idleworkers

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Fri, 2012-07-20 at 09:52 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Ooh, yeah, I agree.  That's next on the wq to-do list.  The problem is
> that queue_work() is implemented in terms of queue_work_on().  

But that's trivial to fix, both could use __queue_work() without too
much bother, right?

> In most
> cases, the local binding serves as locality optimization than anything
> else.  There are use cases where affinity is required for correctness.

> The assumption was that they should flush during CPU_DOWN but it
> probably will be much better to require users which need CPU affinity
> to always use queue_work_on() - instead of implicit local affinity
> from queue_work() - and flush them automatically from wq callback.
> 

Right, and when you create this new mode, which you need to know to
flush on DOWN, you can simply put a BUG_ON in queue_work_on() when this
mode is set.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/