[PATCH 09/11] perf top: error handling for counter creation should parallel perf-record
From: David Ahern
Date: Fri Jul 20 2012 - 19:26:26 EST
5a7ed29 fixed up perf-record but not perf-top. Similar argument
holds for it -- fallback to PMU only if it does not exist and handle
invalid attributes separately.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@xxxxxxx>
---
tools/perf/builtin-top.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
index e3cab5f..0ce665c 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-top.c
@@ -943,8 +943,10 @@ try_again:
* based cpu-clock-tick sw counter, which
* is always available even if no PMU support:
*/
- if (attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE &&
- attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
+ if ((err == ENOENT || err == ENXIO)
+ && attr->type == PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE
+ && attr->config == PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES) {
+
if (verbose)
ui__warning("Cycles event not supported,\n"
"trying to fall back to cpu-clock-ticks\n");
--
1.7.10.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/