Re: perf with precise attribute kills all KVM based VMs

[Avi Kivity]

On 07/21/2012 02:34 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/11/12 1:10 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>> Looks like Avi is right about the overshoot. Can you test something
>> like this?
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> index 166546e..5fb371a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
>> @@ -1374,8 +1374,11 @@ static struct perf_guest_switch_msr
>> *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
>>       arr[0].msr = MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL;
>>       arr[0].host = x86_pmu.intel_ctrl & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_guest_mask;
>>       arr[0].guest = x86_pmu.intel_ctrl & ~cpuc->intel_ctrl_host_mask;
>> +    arr[1].msr = MSR_IA32_PEBS_ENABLE;
>> +    arr[1].host = cpuc->pebs_enabled;
>> +    arr[1].guest = 0;
>> +    *nr = 2;
>>
>> -    *nr = 1;
>>       return arr;
>>   }
> 
> 
> Tested-by: David Ahern <dsahern@xxxxxxxxx>

Thanks.

Gleb, please add a comment explaining about the skid, because otherwise
it looks redundant.


-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/