Re: [PATCH 0/5] cpusets: dynamical scheduler domain flags

[Michael Wang]

On 07/21/2012 12:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 17:03 +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
>> This patch set provide a way for user to dynamically configure the scheduler
>> domain flags, which usually to be static. 
> 
> NAK.. you don't get to expose all this nonsense in a 'stable' ABI.
> 
> You shouldn't need to prod at them to begin with.

So is that means expose those domain flags to user is a bad idea at all?

Is this caused by that people don't need such feature or this feature
has do harm to kernel's stability?(it could be not...)

Regards,
Michael Wang

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/