Re: [RFC 02/23] ARM: LPAE: use signed arithmetic for maskdefinitions
From: Catalin Marinas
Date: Tue Jul 24 2012 - 06:06:24 EST
On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 02:09:04AM +0100, Cyril Chemparathy wrote:
> This patch applies to PAGE_MASK, PMD_MASK, and PGDIR_MASK, where forcing
> unsigned long math truncates the mask at the 32-bits. This clearly does bad
> things on PAE systems.
>
> This patch fixes this problem by defining these masks as signed quantities.
> We then rely on sign extension to do the right thing.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cyril Chemparathy <cyril@xxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Andrianov <vitalya@xxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/include/asm/page.h | 7 ++++++-
> arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable-3level.h | 6 +++---
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> index ecf9019..1c810d2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/page.h
> @@ -13,7 +13,12 @@
> /* PAGE_SHIFT determines the page size */
> #define PAGE_SHIFT 12
> #define PAGE_SIZE (_AC(1,UL) << PAGE_SHIFT)
> -#define PAGE_MASK (~(PAGE_SIZE-1))
> +
> +/*
> + * We do not use PAGE_SIZE in the following because we rely on sign
> + * extension to appropriately extend upper bits for PAE systems
> + */
> +#define PAGE_MASK (~((1 << PAGE_SHIFT) - 1))
Would it work if we use a 1ULL here and avoid the sign trick? I'm
worried about some context where this would lose the sign. We could have
an #ifdef here while the PGDIR/PMD masks are in a separate file already.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/