Re: [PATCH 00/34] Memory management performance backports for -stable V2

[Hillf Danton]

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx> wrote:
> FWIW, I'm all for performance backports.  They do have a downside though
> (other than the risk of bugs slipping in, or triggering latent bugs).
>
> When the next enterprise kernel is built, marketeers ask for numbers to
> make potential customers drool over, and you _can't produce any_ because
> you wedged all the spiffy performance stuff into the crusty old kernel.
>
Well do your job please.

	Suse 11 SP1 kernel panic on HP hardware
	https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/7/24/136
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/