[PATCH 34/52] ACPICA: Add support for implicit notify on multiple devices
From: Len Brown
Date: Tue Jul 24 2012 - 23:48:24 EST
From: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
Adds basic support to allow multiple devices to be implicitly
notified.
This change is partially derived from original commit 981858b("ACPI /
ACPICA: Implicit notify for multiple devices") by Rafael.
Signed-off-by: Bob Moore <robert.moore@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 11 ++++-
drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c | 22 ++++-----
drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeutil.c | 20 ++++++++
drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c | 106 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
index af7330f..6b225e8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h
@@ -404,6 +404,13 @@ struct acpi_gpe_handler_info {
u8 originally_enabled; /* True if GPE was originally enabled */
};
+/* Notify info for implicit notify, multiple device objects */
+
+struct acpi_gpe_notify_info {
+ struct acpi_namespace_node *device_node; /* Device to be notified */
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *next;
+};
+
struct acpi_gpe_notify_object {
struct acpi_namespace_node *node;
struct acpi_gpe_notify_object *next;
@@ -412,7 +419,7 @@ struct acpi_gpe_notify_object {
union acpi_gpe_dispatch_info {
struct acpi_namespace_node *method_node; /* Method node for this GPE level */
struct acpi_gpe_handler_info *handler; /* Installed GPE handler */
- struct acpi_gpe_notify_object device; /* List of _PRW devices for implicit notify */
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *notify_list; /* List of _PRW devices for implicit notifies */
};
/*
@@ -420,7 +427,7 @@ union acpi_gpe_dispatch_info {
* NOTE: Important to keep this struct as small as possible.
*/
struct acpi_gpe_event_info {
- union acpi_gpe_dispatch_info dispatch; /* Either Method or Handler */
+ union acpi_gpe_dispatch_info dispatch; /* Either Method, Handler, or notify_list */
struct acpi_gpe_register_info *register_info; /* Backpointer to register info */
u8 flags; /* Misc info about this GPE */
u8 gpe_number; /* This GPE */
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
index 8ba0e5f..afbd5cb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpe.c
@@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
acpi_status status;
struct acpi_gpe_event_info *local_gpe_event_info;
struct acpi_evaluate_info *info;
- struct acpi_gpe_notify_object *notify_object;
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *notify;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method);
@@ -517,17 +517,17 @@ static void ACPI_SYSTEM_XFACE acpi_ev_asynch_execute_gpe_method(void *context)
* completes. The notify handlers are NOT invoked synchronously
* from this thread -- because handlers may in turn run other
* control methods.
+ *
+ * June 2012: Expand implicit notify mechanism to support
+ * notifies on multiple device objects.
*/
- status = acpi_ev_queue_notify_request(
- local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.node,
- ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE);
-
- notify_object = local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.next;
- while (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && notify_object) {
- status = acpi_ev_queue_notify_request(
- notify_object->node,
- ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE);
- notify_object = notify_object->next;
+ notify = local_gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
+ while (ACPI_SUCCESS(status) && notify) {
+ status =
+ acpi_ev_queue_notify_request(notify->device_node,
+ ACPI_NOTIFY_DEVICE_WAKE);
+
+ notify = notify->next;
}
break;
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeutil.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeutil.c
index 3c43796..0c33c62 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeutil.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evgpeutil.c
@@ -347,6 +347,8 @@ acpi_ev_delete_gpe_handlers(struct acpi_gpe_xrupt_info *gpe_xrupt_info,
void *context)
{
struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *notify;
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *next;
u32 i;
u32 j;
@@ -365,10 +367,28 @@ acpi_ev_delete_gpe_handlers(struct acpi_gpe_xrupt_info *gpe_xrupt_info,
if ((gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) ==
ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_HANDLER) {
+
+ /* Delete an installed handler block */
+
ACPI_FREE(gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler);
gpe_event_info->dispatch.handler = NULL;
gpe_event_info->flags &=
~ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK;
+ } else if ((gpe_event_info->
+ flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) ==
+ ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY) {
+
+ /* Delete the implicit notification device list */
+
+ notify = gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
+ while (notify) {
+ next = notify->next;
+ ACPI_FREE(notify);
+ notify = next;
+ }
+ gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list = NULL;
+ gpe_event_info->flags &=
+ ~ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK;
}
}
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
index 86f9b34..2ce4409 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/evxfgpe.c
@@ -197,12 +197,12 @@ acpi_status
acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake(acpi_handle wake_device,
acpi_handle gpe_device, u32 gpe_number)
{
- acpi_status status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
+ acpi_status status;
struct acpi_gpe_event_info *gpe_event_info;
struct acpi_namespace_node *device_node;
- struct acpi_gpe_notify_object *notify_object;
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *notify;
+ struct acpi_gpe_notify_info *new_notify;
acpi_cpu_flags flags;
- u8 gpe_dispatch_mask;
ACPI_FUNCTION_TRACE(acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake);
@@ -216,63 +216,95 @@ acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake(acpi_handle wake_device,
return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_BAD_PARAMETER);
}
+ /* Handle root object case */
+
+ if (wake_device == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
+ device_node = acpi_gbl_root_node;
+ } else {
+ device_node = ACPI_CAST_PTR(struct acpi_namespace_node, wake_device);
+ }
+
+ /* Validate WakeDevice is of type Device */
+
+ if (device_node->type != ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) {
+ return_ACPI_STATUS (AE_BAD_PARAMETER);
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Allocate a new notify object up front, in case it is needed.
+ * Memory allocation while holding a spinlock is a big no-no
+ * on some hosts.
+ */
+ new_notify = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(struct acpi_gpe_notify_info));
+ if (!new_notify) {
+ return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NO_MEMORY);
+ }
+
flags = acpi_os_acquire_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock);
/* Ensure that we have a valid GPE number */
gpe_event_info = acpi_ev_get_gpe_event_info(gpe_device, gpe_number);
if (!gpe_event_info) {
+ status = AE_BAD_PARAMETER;
goto unlock_and_exit;
}
- if (wake_device == ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT) {
- goto out;
- }
-
/*
* If there is no method or handler for this GPE, then the
- * wake_device will be notified whenever this GPE fires (aka
- * "implicit notify") Note: The GPE is assumed to be
+ * wake_device will be notified whenever this GPE fires. This is
+ * known as an "implicit notify". Note: The GPE is assumed to be
* level-triggered (for windows compatibility).
*/
- gpe_dispatch_mask = gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK;
- if (gpe_dispatch_mask != ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NONE
- && gpe_dispatch_mask != ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY) {
- goto out;
- }
-
- /* Validate wake_device is of type Device */
-
- device_node = ACPI_CAST_PTR(struct acpi_namespace_node, wake_device);
- if (device_node->type != ACPI_TYPE_DEVICE) {
- goto unlock_and_exit;
+ if ((gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) ==
+ ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NONE) {
+ /*
+ * This is the first device for implicit notify on this GPE.
+ * Just set the flags here, and enter the NOTIFY block below.
+ */
+ gpe_event_info->flags =
+ (ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY | ACPI_GPE_LEVEL_TRIGGERED);
}
- if (gpe_dispatch_mask == ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NONE) {
- gpe_event_info->flags = (ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY |
- ACPI_GPE_LEVEL_TRIGGERED);
- gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.node = device_node;
- gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.next = NULL;
- } else {
- /* There are multiple devices to notify implicitly. */
-
- notify_object = ACPI_ALLOCATE_ZEROED(sizeof(*notify_object));
- if (!notify_object) {
- status = AE_NO_MEMORY;
- goto unlock_and_exit;
+ /*
+ * If we already have an implicit notify on this GPE, add
+ * this device to the notify list.
+ */
+ if ((gpe_event_info->flags & ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_MASK) ==
+ ACPI_GPE_DISPATCH_NOTIFY) {
+
+ /* Ensure that the device is not already in the list */
+
+ notify = gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
+ while (notify) {
+ if (notify->device_node == device_node) {
+ status = AE_ALREADY_EXISTS;
+ goto unlock_and_exit;
+ }
+ notify = notify->next;
}
- notify_object->node = device_node;
- notify_object->next = gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.next;
- gpe_event_info->dispatch.device.next = notify_object;
+ /* Add this device to the notify list for this GPE */
+
+ new_notify->device_node = device_node;
+ new_notify->next = gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list;
+ gpe_event_info->dispatch.notify_list = new_notify;
+ new_notify = NULL;
}
- out:
+ /* Mark the GPE as a possible wake event */
+
gpe_event_info->flags |= ACPI_GPE_CAN_WAKE;
status = AE_OK;
- unlock_and_exit:
+unlock_and_exit:
acpi_os_release_lock(acpi_gbl_gpe_lock, flags);
+
+ /* Delete the notify object if it was not used above */
+
+ if (new_notify) {
+ ACPI_FREE(new_notify);
+ }
return_ACPI_STATUS(status);
}
ACPI_EXPORT_SYMBOL(acpi_setup_gpe_for_wake)
--
1.7.12.rc0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/