Re: [REPOST #3 PATCH v2] Input: atkbd - make repeat period moreaccurate.

[Dmitry Torokhov]

Hi George,

On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:42:28PM -0400, George Spelvin wrote:
> This replaces some inaccurate lookup tables with an exact
> computation.  Although the diff adds source comments,
> it shrinks binary size.  (By only 50 bytes, but hey.)
> 
> AT keyboard repeat rates are multiples of 1/240 second
> expressed in a 0.2.3 bit floating point format.  That
> is, possible values are ({8..15} << {0..3}) / 240 s.

OK.

> 
> In addition to a slightly inaccurate lookup table, the
> old code would round up to the next repeat period.
> E.g. to get a period of 9/60 = 0.15 seconds, you had to
> ask for no more than 149 ms; if you asked for 150, it
> would round up to 167.

This works as intended - it was designed to never have faster than
requested.

>  The new code rounds to nearest.
> 
> User-visible changes to the repeat periods reported by EVIOCGREP:
> 
> Old	 37	109	116	149	182	232
> Exact	 37.50	108.33	116.66	150.00	183.33	233.33
> New	 38	108	117	150	183	233
> 
> Old	270	303	370	435	470
> Exact	266.66	300.00	366.66	433.33	466.66
> New	267	300	367	433	467
> 
> This does not bother utilities like kbdrate(8).
> 
> Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>

I am sorry but I have to ask - is this your real name?

> ---
>  drivers/input/keyboard/atkbd.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> Now that 3.5 is out, I'm posting this for a FOURTH time,
> hoping for some comments of any sort.
> 
> 
> Now that I've tweaked it (v1 had an error in rounding near exponent
> range boundaries), I think it's ready for merging upstream.
> 
> 
> One possible bug I observed in the code that calls this:
> 
> Users of the KDKBDREP ioctl seem to assume that it returns the actual
> values set, but I'm not sure it really works that way; I don't think
> the command to change the parameters makes its way through the event
> queue and atkbd's schedule_delayed_work() to actually set dev->rep[]
> to the rounded values before kbd_rate_helper returns them to userspace.
> 
> If desired, the fix that's most obvious to me would be to split this
> function in two: perform the conversion to a command byte synchronously,
> and only defer the actual ps2_command().

Yes, I agree, this is a problem.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/