Re: linux-next: Tree for July 25 (mfd/arizona)

[Samuel Ortiz]

Hi Randy

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 11:19:59AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 09:30 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > 
> > Changes since 20120724:
> > 
> > 
> > The mfd tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
> 
> 
> 
> on i386 and x86_64:
> 
> CONFIG_MFD_ARIZONA=y
> CONFIG_MFD_ARIZONA_I2C=m
> CONFIG_MFD_CORE=m
> 
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init':
> (.devinit.text+0x3ab0): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init':
> (.devinit.text+0x3fdc): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init':
> (.devinit.text+0x3fff): undefined reference to `mfd_add_devices'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_init':
> (.devinit.text+0x4059): undefined reference to `mfd_remove_devices'
> drivers/built-in.o: In function `arizona_dev_exit':
> (.devexit.text+0x9): undefined reference to `mfd_remove_devices'
> 
> because MFD_ARIZONA is bool, so builtin, while MFD_CORE=m,
> so the builtin code cannot call the loadable module code.
This is fixed now, by having MFD_ARIZONA selecting MFD_CORE.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/