Re: [PATCH V4 3/3] virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk

[Rusty Russell]

On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:11:15 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 10:21:05AM +0800, Asias He wrote:
> > This patch introduces bio-based IO path for virtio-blk.
> > 
> > Compared to request-based IO path, bio-based IO path uses driver
> > provided ->make_request_fn() method to bypasses the IO scheduler. It
> > handles the bio to device directly without allocating a request in block
> > layer. This reduces the IO path in guest kernel to achieve high IOPS
> > and lower latency. The downside is that guest can not use the IO
> > scheduler to merge and sort requests. However, this is not a big problem
> > if the backend disk in host side uses faster disk device.
> 
> If this optimization depends on the host, then it
> should be reported to the guest using a feature bit,
> as opposed to being guest driven.

I consider this approach a half-way step.  Quick attempts on my laptop
and I couldn't find a case where the bio path was a loss, but in theory
if the host wasn't doing any reordering and it was a slow device, you'd
want the guest to do so.

I'm not sure if current qemu can be configured to do such a thing?

Cheers,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/