Re: [RFC][PATCH v3 1/3] runtime interpreted power sequences

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:44:29AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 07:05 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:

> > +		power-on-sequence {
> > +			regulator@0 {
> > +				id = "power";
> > +				enable;

> What do this mean? Isn't this implied for a regulator?

I assume you might have some sequences which need some things to be
turned off for some reason; it at least seems to be something you'd want
to design for.

> This looks like you designed the platform_data structs first and then
> came up with device nodes to mirror the struct.

Judging by most of the DT I review this seems idiomatic :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/