Re: [GIT PULL] GPIO changes for v3.6

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 02:47:24PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:

> ... though it occurs to me that it is possible that the GPIO number might not
> be allocated until something else has been probed, so a -ve gpio number could
> mean "there is no such gpio" or it could mean "gpio has not been allocated
> yet".  I wonder if that should be allowed and where it should be handled.

If there's logic to do things like that I'd 

> I'd really like to see gpios be requested by name ... anyone know if there
> are any plans along that line?

I've not noticed anyone doing much substantial work on GPIO recently.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/