Re: [PATCH] mfd: arizona: convert to regmap_add_irq_chips

[Stephen Warren]

On 07/30/2012 12:03 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:05:08AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 07/29/2012 02:38 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 01:02:56PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> 
>>>> 1) regmap_add_irq_chips() calls regmap_add_irq_chip() with irq==0 rather
>>>>    than -1, so in turn irq_domain_add_linear() is called rather than
>>>>    irq_domain_add_legacy(). This change could be avoided by providing an
>>>>    irq_bases array to regmap_add_irq_chips().
> 
>>> This is a problem.
> 
>> OK, can you explain why? Is the problem the difference between the two
>> types of IRQ domain? I would have assumed this was an internal detail of
>> the driver hence not an issue. I assume there's no issue with
>> known/static IRQ numbers, since both 0 and -1 end up dynamically
>> allocating the IRQ bases IIRC.
> 
> We have GPIOs we might want to do interrupts on, if the API doesn't
> support providing a base we've got an issue.

I agree in general, but I don't see how this is a regression in this
change - the arizona pdata doesn't specify an IRQ base anywhere, and
hence the IRQ base is already dynamically allocated...

The (regmap-irq) API (in the patch I sent) does support optionally
specifying a base if you want, it's just that the arizona-irq.c patch I
sent didn't specify a base, since the original code didn't.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/