Re: [PATCH 11/11] ARM: Get rid of .LCcralign local label usage inalignment_trap macro

[Anton Vorontsov]

On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 03:15:44PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:58:20AM -0700, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> > This makes the code more izolated.
> > 
> > The downside of this is that we now have an additional branch and the
> > code itself is 8 bytes longer. But on the bright side, this new layout
> > can be more cache friendly since cr_alignment address might be already
> > in the cache line (not that I measured anything, it's just fun to think
> > about it).
> 
> The caches are harvard, so mixing data and code together does not increase
> performance.  Having data which is used by the same code in the same cache
> line results in better performance.
> 
> The additional branch will also cause a pipeline stall on older CPUs.
> 
> So no, I don't see any way that this is a performance improvement.  Please
> leave this as is.

Sure, will drop it.

Thanks!

-- 
Anton Vorontsov
Email: cbouatmailru@xxxxxxxxx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/