[ 31/70] x86, nops: Missing break resulting in incorrect selection on Intel

[Ben Hutchings]

3.2-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit d6250a3f12edb3a86db9598ffeca3de8b4a219e9 upstream.

The Intel case falls through into the generic case which then changes
the values.  For cases like the P6 it doesn't do the right thing so
this seems to be a screwup.

Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-lww2uirad4skzjlmrm0vru8o@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 1f84794..73ef56c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ void __init arch_init_ideal_nops(void)
 			ideal_nops = intel_nops;
 #endif
 		}
-
+		break;
 	default:
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 		ideal_nops = k8_nops;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/