Re: [PATCH 0/5] mfd: replace IORESOURCE_IO by IORESOURCE_MEM

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Tuesday 07 August 2012, Russell King wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 07, 2012 at 11:28:27AM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > If we introduce a new IORESOURCE_OTHER, I would actually prefer to
> > define it to 0x00000000 for purely aesthetic reasons, the effect
> > should be the same as using 0x00000300.
> 
> I'd suggest not, because we can use that to detect uninitialized
> resources (and we probably do so in some places.)  IOW, I think that's
> asking for problems when this moves outside platform code.

Good point. Let's use 0x00000300 then.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/