Re: [PATCH 1/1] tcp: Wrong timeout for SYN segments
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed Aug 29 2012 - 04:51:40 EST
On Tue, 2012-08-28 at 21:34 -0700, H.K. Jerry Chu wrote:
> IMHO 31secs seem a little short. Why not change it to 6 as well because 63
> secs still beats 93secs with 3sec initRTO and 5 retries.
>
> Jerry
>
My rationale was that such increase were going to amplify SYN attacks
impact by 20% (if we count number of useless SYNACK sent)
If the active side sends SYN packets for 180 seconds, do we really want
to also send SYNACKS for additional 100 seconds ?
Sure, RFC numbers are what they are, but in practice, I doubt someone
will really miss the extra SYNACK sent after ~32 seconds, since it would
matter only for the last SYN attempted.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/